.
IIRC, the UK originally was against dedicated DRL legislation
O-rly . . . and your source is?
For the record - the UK has NEVER been 'against' any DRL legislation.
and was in favour of the dipping method but was quashed by the EC - This may have something to do with it.
Bullsh*t! The 'dim-dip' regulations had fcuk all to do with DRLs. The dim-dip regs were bought in in the 1980s - to try to stop twats driving on only side lights. That law backfired - because whilst it became impossible to drive on sidelights where it was legally possible to do so (ie, in a built up area subject to a 30mph speed limit AND lit by street lights), the said twats then insisted on driving in 40/50/60/70mph areas still on dim-dim, instead of proper headlamps. And driving at 70mph with the wrong lights is far more dangerous than driving at 30mph with the wrong lights! For this reason, and this reason only - the dim-dip law was rescinded.
I've read that currently 17 countries in Europe have DRL legislation. I doubt that the UK is up to speed on this yet.
Erm . . . is the UK not a member state of the EU now?????? UK 'Type Approval' has to comply with EU Type Approval - so if its law in the EU, it is law in the UK.
Whatever the legislation, the light from LED's is far more effective and efficient than using other light sources, dimmed or otherwise < IMO! [well, actually in some high level studies too].
Agreed.