Make a donation

Author Topic: Comparison on Neuspeed Intake  (Read 3879 times)

Offline bacillus

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 4
  • -Receive: 451
  • Posts: 6330
Comparison on Neuspeed Intake
« on: February 08, 2009, 03:12:39 pm »
You may want to reconsider after viewing this pic


Sourced from this thread  http://www.golfmkv.com/forums/showthread.php?t=77246
« Last Edit: February 09, 2009, 08:56:23 pm by SteveP »
Without traction power is nothing!

Offline SteveP

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 117
  • -Receive: 340
  • Posts: 6005
    • My Project
Intakes
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2009, 08:55:46 pm »
I have split this topic off from Matt a's for sale thread  :happy2:

Offline KRL

  • Won't Shut up.
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 25
  • -Receive: 29
  • Posts: 619
Re: Comparison on Neuspeed Intake
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2009, 02:05:46 pm »
Anybody know if the BSH intake is available in the UK?

I think it looks really good.  It combines the the best of both worlds - CAI and HAI.

Offline bacillus

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 4
  • -Receive: 451
  • Posts: 6330
Re: Comparison on Neuspeed Intake
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2009, 07:50:14 pm »
Unfortunately you'll have to order direct from BSH.

The website doesn't yet give you an overseas shipping option so you'll have to email Phil or Brandon for an inclusive costing.

In case anyone is wondering what the graph actually indicates, this is what ross tech says:

"Your peak airflow should be roughly 0.80 times your horsepower if you are close to sea level. So, if you have a stock 150 hp 1.8T, expect around 120 g/s. If you see significantly less than that, you MAF may be on the way out. Also note that airflow will be markedly different at higher altitudes due to reduced ambient air pressure, especially with naturally aspirated engines that do not have forced induction to overcome that deficiency. This still works if you are chipped, but "race" programs may make more power through timing, rather than airflow. Therefore, take all readings with a grain of salt".

« Last Edit: February 13, 2009, 08:08:59 pm by bacillus »
Without traction power is nothing!

Offline niallo

  • Taking part
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 29
    • Email
Re: Comparison on Neuspeed Intake
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2009, 06:18:50 pm »
just enquired bout bsh intake and the guy from bsh quoted 352 dollars which is 248 pounds.

Offline RedRobin

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 380
  • -Receive: 442
  • Posts: 16627
  • BIALI Motorsport's Chief Horn Blower
Re: Comparison on Neuspeed Intake
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2009, 06:57:01 pm »
^^^^
Not trying to put you off but don't forget about shipping costs and UK import feckin tax.


On facebook: https://www.facebook.com/robin.procter.50

Throbbin' Red Mk5 GTI DSG with too many mods to list - Have Fun but Safe Journeys!

Offline Top Cat

  • Top cat
  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 171
  • -Receive: 335
  • Posts: 8196
  • Almost Jacamo
Re: Comparison on Neuspeed Intake
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2009, 06:59:01 pm »
There may be a better offer coming soon on this intake. Just hang fire  :wink:

Offline bacillus

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 4
  • -Receive: 451
  • Posts: 6330
Re: Comparison on Neuspeed Intake
« Reply #7 on: February 18, 2009, 07:14:42 pm »
There may be a better offer coming soon on this intake. Just hang fire  :wink:

Sounds intriguing..... 
Without traction power is nothing!

Offline niallo

  • Taking part
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 29
    • Email
Re: Comparison on Neuspeed Intake
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2009, 09:26:04 pm »
that includes shippin but not tax haha . damm government

Offline KRL

  • Won't Shut up.
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 25
  • -Receive: 29
  • Posts: 619
Re: Comparison on Neuspeed Intake
« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2009, 11:36:34 pm »
There may be a better offer coming soon on this intake. Just hang fire  :wink:

I like the sound of that!

Offline Howardvwgolf

  • Always Involved
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 1
  • Posts: 120
Re: Comparison on Neuspeed Intake
« Reply #10 on: February 23, 2009, 10:37:24 pm »
me too, very interesting!!!

matt a

  • Guest
Re: Comparison on Neuspeed Intake
« Reply #11 on: February 26, 2009, 08:10:14 am »
Had a look at the BSH, the pipe work and filter seem very similar to the new speed. The filter may drop down fractionally lower, but the difference seems to be the filter enclosure/cold air feed, therefore the Neuspeed should produce a similar result with the addition of a similar housing.

Offline RedRobin

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 380
  • -Receive: 442
  • Posts: 16627
  • BIALI Motorsport's Chief Horn Blower
Re: Comparison on Neuspeed Intake
« Reply #12 on: February 26, 2009, 08:26:54 am »
....

It seems to me that all the 'lollipop-on-a-stick' filters are pretty similar and that their extra performance claims depend on the filter enclosure and the car they are tested on. Consequently it's quite difficult deciding which aftermarket air intake is best to buy.

For now I'm happy with my ITG in the stock box with Carbonio, but I'm not kidding myself that there are many gains, rather that it (hopefully, and I'm told) improves efficiency and that it has not been an issue when I was under VW warranty. Oh, and that the Carbonio looks pretty  8)


On facebook: https://www.facebook.com/robin.procter.50

Throbbin' Red Mk5 GTI DSG with too many mods to list - Have Fun but Safe Journeys!

matt a

  • Guest
Re: Comparison on Neuspeed Intake
« Reply #13 on: February 26, 2009, 08:33:18 am »
You're right Robin, does seem to be down to the enclosure, but worth mentioning. The Neuspeed certainly does lack one, and I pretty sure the figures would be different again, if it had one.