Make a donation

Author Topic: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test  (Read 6318 times)

Offline Hurdy

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 52
  • -Receive: 137
  • Posts: 7683
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2010, 04:24:42 pm »
evo is always worth buying, the only car mag worth buying tbh, as for the golf r, it got three and a half stars which is rubbish. dont like the 4wd (as its not its fwd) and dont seem to like dsg( because its boring) :signLOL: to be honest was never gonna compete with the sti and evo in terms of driving but thats not what its gonna be bought for, like all golfs its an everyday car, because that what they do best.

You'll need a passenger ride in the RS3 or TT-RS - preferrably a mapped one :wink:
Golf R gone.

Offline jhtrophy

  • Won't Shut up.
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 8
  • -Receive: 5
  • Posts: 506
  • Oh no it's a diesel
    • Email
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #16 on: December 30, 2010, 05:29:27 pm »
im not saying i dont like the golf r cos i do, i would have it over the others, what im saying is the none of the above are gonna beat the sti or evo in terms of having a blast, but yeah i will have a ride in the rs3 when you get it :wink:
BMW 335d msport touring lci. Auto, estate and diesel! Oh no

Offline rdfcpete

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 98
  • -Receive: 52
  • Posts: 2567
    • Email
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #17 on: December 30, 2010, 05:45:19 pm »
Pete


RNS-E LED 2012 | Aux-In | AP Coilovers |  Hawk HPS Pads | Revo Stage 1+
Previous: OEM+ 2006 MK5 Golf GTI 2.0T FSI Steel Grey 3 Door

Offline Hurdy

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 52
  • -Receive: 137
  • Posts: 7683
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #18 on: December 30, 2010, 06:23:42 pm »
evo is always worth buying,

+1  :happy2:

I managed to bag a years subscription for £12, Autosport is a good place to subscribe as they always have a decent offer on :happy2:
Golf R gone.

Offline Gene Hunt

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 59
  • -Receive: 61
  • Posts: 2478
    • Email
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #19 on: December 30, 2010, 07:09:19 pm »
Mine landed on the mat today.  :smiley:
ED35. Standard factory condition.

Offline rdfcpete

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 98
  • -Receive: 52
  • Posts: 2567
    • Email
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #20 on: December 30, 2010, 07:54:20 pm »
evo is always worth buying,

+1  :happy2:

I managed to bag a years subscription for £12, Autosport is a good place to subscribe as they always have a decent offer on :happy2:

 :party: - Do you know someone there John?
They're based just five miles up the road from me in Wollaston  :smiley:
Pete


RNS-E LED 2012 | Aux-In | AP Coilovers |  Hawk HPS Pads | Revo Stage 1+
Previous: OEM+ 2006 MK5 Golf GTI 2.0T FSI Steel Grey 3 Door

Offline Hurdy

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 52
  • -Receive: 137
  • Posts: 7683
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #21 on: December 30, 2010, 11:14:24 pm »

 :party: - Do you know someone there John?
They're based just five miles up the road from me in Wollaston  :smiley:

No, but to clarify a little more the Autosport show has had very good subscription offers on over the last 3 years :happy2:
Golf R gone.

Offline Poverty

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 36
  • -Receive: 21
  • Posts: 1543
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #22 on: December 30, 2010, 11:47:20 pm »
evo is a pile of wank.

I dont need to read their mag to find out what the vedict will be!

h4rdy

  • Guest
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #23 on: December 30, 2010, 11:52:43 pm »
evo is a pile of wank.

I dont need to read their mag to find out what the vedict will be!

One in a million :signLOL:

Offline simonp

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 10
  • -Receive: 38
  • Posts: 1095
  • No longer a Golfer
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #24 on: December 30, 2010, 11:55:02 pm »
My guess is 3rd out of 3 in the test, it's overpriced and you should save money by getting a GTI instead??

Offline jhtrophy

  • Won't Shut up.
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 8
  • -Receive: 5
  • Posts: 506
  • Oh no it's a diesel
    • Email
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #25 on: December 31, 2010, 08:19:21 am »
evo is a pile of wank.

I dont need to read their mag to find out what the vedict will be!
evo is a about drivers cars, they dont worry about mpg, boot space, comfort etc.., hence why some cars get bad reviews, not a pile of wank is it. and again it was easy to work out that golf r would not win that test, if you want to know about how a car is to own and live with buy what car, if you want a drivers car buy evo.
BMW 335d msport touring lci. Auto, estate and diesel! Oh no

h4rdy

  • Guest
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #26 on: December 31, 2010, 10:10:29 am »
evo is a pile of wank.

I dont need to read their mag to find out what the vedict will be!
evo is a about drivers cars, they dont worry about mpg, boot space, comfort etc.., hence why some cars get bad reviews, not a pile of wank is it. and again it was easy to work out that golf r would not win that test, if you want to know about how a car is to own and live with buy what car, if you want a drivers car buy evo.

Here here!

Childish comments like the above should be kept to ones self.

EVO is THE best Car Magazine available to buy at the moment.

As was Performance Car back in the 80's which EVO kinda sprang from.

Offline simonp

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 10
  • -Receive: 38
  • Posts: 1095
  • No longer a Golfer
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #27 on: December 31, 2010, 11:01:52 am »
Quote from: jhtrophy
if you want a drivers car and have 150 grand to spend buy evo.

FYP.  :happy2:

Offline andrewparker

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 32
  • -Receive: 78
  • Posts: 1770
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #28 on: December 31, 2010, 11:22:55 am »
Their reviews of Audi and VW cars are fairly predictable, but then so are Audi and VW cars, so it's hardly a surprise!

They seem pretty fond of their TT-RS long-termer, it just doesn't seem to be a car they have fallen in love with. The RS5 on the other hand, well they absolutely hated it!

Must be a great job writing for the mag!

Offline Poverty

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 36
  • -Receive: 21
  • Posts: 1543
Re: Next months EVO has landed - Golf R test
« Reply #29 on: January 02, 2011, 08:47:32 pm »
evo is a pile of wank.

I dont need to read their mag to find out what the vedict will be!
evo is a about drivers cars, they dont worry about mpg, boot space, comfort etc.., hence why some cars get bad reviews, not a pile of wank is it. and again it was easy to work out that golf r would not win that test, if you want to know about how a car is to own and live with buy what car, if you want a drivers car buy evo.

EGO magazine is a pile of wank. Im not saying this because VAGs dont do too well, I couldnt care less, but what exactly do you learn new from reading the evo mag? I can summarise to you what they would say if the did a test against a 997.2 gt3 rs vs the 458 italia, because quite frankly it wont be all that much different from when they did the f430 vs 997 gt3 rs.

Plus unless we win the lottery its unlikely any of us will ever be able to afford 97% of the cars they rave on about in that mag.

Whatcar isnt a car enthusiasts mag either its a guide for people who arent really interested in cars but need help deciding on what to buy next.

The germans do car magazines the best, they do all types of cars, with proper data, info and statistics that they have achieved themselves instead of quoting the MF claims