Make a donation

Author Topic: Autotech vs APR HPFP  (Read 52453 times)

Offline PDT

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 3
  • -Receive: 142
  • Posts: 2010
    • Email
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #135 on: March 03, 2012, 04:57:37 pm »
Log block 114 and 230 and all should become clear.

Offline cupra_k1

  • Always Involved
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 4
  • -Receive: 8
  • Posts: 140
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #136 on: March 03, 2012, 05:03:06 pm »
All dependant on engine load i'd imagine.

Offline Janner_Sy

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 62
  • -Receive: 113
  • Posts: 5392
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #137 on: March 03, 2012, 05:54:52 pm »
All dependant on engine load i'd imagine.

Id imagine like all previous logging runs, he'll be at WOT from very low revs to the redline.  If hes on the same stretch of road id expect the load to be pretty similar.

Offline PDT

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 3
  • -Receive: 142
  • Posts: 2010
    • Email
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #138 on: March 03, 2012, 05:58:10 pm »
Load (requested and actual) often has no relation to throttle angle, load is the final request the ecu makes after taking all factors into account so if intake temp is high/low or ign advance is overadvanced etc... Then load value will change accordingly.

Offline heavyd

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 29
  • -Receive: 29
  • Posts: 1372
    • Email
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #139 on: March 03, 2012, 07:15:40 pm »
I'm used to all the other maps I had where it requested either 110, 121 or 130bar when car is under load, seems strange this new one does away with that, and actually modulates fuel pressure, which can only be a good thing at the end of the day.
Which is the best block for measuring intake temps?

Offline Janner_Sy

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 62
  • -Receive: 113
  • Posts: 5392
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #140 on: March 03, 2012, 07:29:36 pm »
I'm used to all the other maps I had where it requested either 110, 121 or 130bar when car is under load, seems strange this new one does away with that, and actually modulates fuel pressure, which can only be a good thing at the end of the day.
Which is the best block for measuring intake temps?


+1 I cant really see anything bad from this.  Never seen it on any other car though.

004-4 iirc for IATs

Offline micky 32

  • Always Involved
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 5
  • -Receive: 4
  • Posts: 213
    • Email
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #141 on: March 04, 2012, 11:10:04 pm »
I bought my autotech second hand. I have now nearly 80k on it with no problems. It gave a healthy 324bhp on JKM's rollers too.
2008 Octavia vRS K04'd , Forge twintercooler, Evoms, Autotech uprated pump, full Milltek exhaust 324bhp on JKM's rollers ;-)

Offline heavyd

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 29
  • -Receive: 29
  • Posts: 1372
    • Email
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #142 on: March 06, 2012, 06:04:03 pm »
Log block 114 and 230 and all should become clear.

Well I logged blocks 114 and 230, still isnt becoming very clear Dave, :stupid:
Its requesting full load, but now only 119.8 bar of rail pressure requested :confused:




Offline RedRobin

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 380
  • -Receive: 442
  • Posts: 16627
  • BIALI Motorsport's Chief Horn Blower
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #143 on: April 05, 2012, 08:14:34 am »

Also the APR pump only provides 125 bar not the 130 bar fuel pressure that most software such as Revo demands on stg2+.


Sorry Dave thats wrong.

I've got logs of my Car on Stage 2+ with the APR Pump and it quite happily meets the requested 130bar.


Sorry, my mistake. I was going off logs from 2 cars with APR pumps and software, its the software that requests 125bar, not the capability of the pump.


....So am I right in thinking that Revo Stage2 (not 2+) on a K03 requests a max of 125bar and so the APR HPFP still has plenty of 'headroom'? And that it isn't necessary to upgrade to Revo2+ just because of having an APR HPFP?


On facebook: https://www.facebook.com/robin.procter.50

Throbbin' Red Mk5 GTI DSG with too many mods to list - Have Fun but Safe Journeys!

Offline Hedge

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 484
  • -Receive: 304
  • Posts: 6621
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #144 on: April 05, 2012, 08:20:22 am »
You can run an uprated pump with any software Robin even stock.

Offline RedRobin

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 380
  • -Receive: 442
  • Posts: 16627
  • BIALI Motorsport's Chief Horn Blower
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #145 on: April 05, 2012, 08:54:00 am »
.
Logging at JKM yesterday has shown that my stock fuel pump was struggling occasionally even with my boost turned down a notch on Revo2 to compensate for the extra air delivery from my Forge Twintake. So I've had to put my money where my mouth has always been regarding the HPFP subject. This has allowed my Revo boost setting to return back up to how it was.


On facebook: https://www.facebook.com/robin.procter.50

Throbbin' Red Mk5 GTI DSG with too many mods to list - Have Fun but Safe Journeys!

Offline Kregiel

  • Always Involved
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 28
  • -Receive: 20
  • Posts: 469
  • Supersonic
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #146 on: April 05, 2012, 09:16:35 am »
Robin,
This is typical with Forge Twintake as it's so efficient it delivers too much air sort to say..... My tuner had similar issue when I got K04 on my gti so he had to tweak the map to compensate for it

Paul
Red 2008 GTI, H&R ARB, b12 suspension, walk, milltek non-res full exhaust, forge IC, tarox 10 pot big brake kit, RS4 valve, Forge SSK, Autotech HPFP, Xenons, K04 Turbo, Quaife LSD, South Bend stage 3 Daily with SMF clutch, XB and UB Unibraces

Offline rich83

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 165
  • -Receive: 802
  • Posts: 13444
    • MK5 Golf GTI
  • My Ride: https://www.mk5golfgti.co.uk/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=l82kqr8bqdcv9temm8gh61n85q&/topic,19740.0.html
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #147 on: April 05, 2012, 09:18:32 am »
So not a cheap JKM visit then Robin! ;-)

Offline danishmkvgti

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 243
  • -Receive: 154
  • Posts: 3680
    • Email
  • My Ride: http://www.mk5golfgti.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,7823.0.html
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #148 on: April 05, 2012, 09:21:02 am »
.
Logging at JKM yesterday has shown that my stock fuel pump was struggling occasionally even with my boost turned down a notch on Revo2 to compensate for the extra air delivery from my Forge Twintake. So I've had to put my money where my mouth has always been regarding the HPFP subject. This has allowed my Revo boost setting to return back up to how it was.

Which one have you gone for RR, or have i missed it?  :party:

Over the top mod list ;o)

Offline rich83

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 165
  • -Receive: 802
  • Posts: 13444
    • MK5 Golf GTI
  • My Ride: https://www.mk5golfgti.co.uk/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=l82kqr8bqdcv9temm8gh61n85q&/topic,19740.0.html
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #149 on: April 05, 2012, 09:22:25 am »
APR... I'm 100% sure of that.