Quote from: MAT ED30 on November 23, 2011, 05:23:38 pmWhat's with the sig Thought provoking and round a handling track I reckon it would be faster than my ED30. Definitely will be once finished!
What's with the sig
Quote from: MAT ED30 on November 23, 2011, 05:23:38 pmWhat's with the sig Finally someone bites
Quote from: Tfsi_Mike on November 23, 2011, 05:27:48 pmQuote from: MAT ED30 on November 23, 2011, 05:23:38 pmWhat's with the sig Finally someone bites Still won't beat a meg trophy
Had the car on the dyno at Statllers again today. The first dyno with the ITG intake on. Impressive is the key word here for the ITG.The only mod between this and my last dyno run at Statllers and today's is the ITGStock airbox/filter - 220.5bhp and 232.5 lbftITG intake - 236.0bhp and 267.9lbft which is an increase of 15.5bhp and 34.4lbftGetting there
Quote from: Hurdy on November 23, 2011, 05:30:51 pmQuote from: MAT ED30 on November 23, 2011, 05:23:38 pmWhat's with the sig Thought provoking and round a handling track I reckon it would be faster than my ED30. Definitely will be once finished! Took 380hp Golf to beat a measely 220hp Polo on track. http://goapr.com.au/media/mm-june2011.pdf
Well yeah obviously as the Golf is heavier so would need more power, it also has a 7 year old ish chassis. Comparing a 220hp car to a 380hp car sounds impressive until you look at power to weight then you see why. Not quite so measely when you think its making that power from a 1.4 litre engine is it Sy. If it was 2.0ltr then yeah you could call it measely.You down at statllers on Saturday John should be there to pick up my car, wouldnt mind having a ganda at the litttle go kart
Quote from: Janner_Sy on November 23, 2011, 05:34:13 pmQuote from: Hurdy on November 23, 2011, 05:30:51 pmQuote from: MAT ED30 on November 23, 2011, 05:23:38 pmWhat's with the sig Thought provoking and round a handling track I reckon it would be faster than my ED30. Definitely will be once finished! Took 380hp Golf to beat a measely 220hp Polo on track. http://goapr.com.au/media/mm-june2011.pdfHow heavy is the polo cos I doubt the polo has the advantage even on bhp per tonne tbh Well yeah obviously as the Golf is heavier so would need more power, it also has a 7 year old ish chassis. Comparing a 220hp car to a 380hp car sounds impressive until you look at power to weight then you see why. Not quite so measely when you think its making that power from a 1.4 litre engine is it Sy. If it was 2.0ltr then yeah you could call it measely.You down at statllers on Saturday John should be there to pick up my car, wouldnt mind having a ganda at the litttle go kart
Quote from: Hurdy on November 23, 2011, 05:30:51 pmQuote from: MAT ED30 on November 23, 2011, 05:23:38 pmWhat's with the sig Thought provoking and round a handling track I reckon it would be faster than my ED30. Definitely will be once finished! Took 380hp Golf to beat a measely 220hp Polo on track. http://goapr.com.au/media/mm-june2011.pdfHow heavy is the polo cos I doubt the polo has the advantage even on bhp per tonne tbh
