Stage 1 only will get 40bhp gain with no other mods. Stock cars came in bang on the money Ben, so Jkm's rollers are fairly accurate.
Depends Ben, If a set of rollers say your car produces X ammount thats more then other rollers then of course you gonna say the one that posted more is the one to believe in.Its a dyno lottery, which no one has the answer. Mine was down 10bhp for shoving redEx in the tank
(which retards the ignition timing) or lowering the octane Rating that the ECU recognises, but all other graphs were bang on the money as my last 3 runs.
278bhp from a Stage 1 Revo car is a bit concerning.. Unless the car has faults or crap fuel etc..
x2
No her car is running faultless, and isnt done on power. Claire and her Husband ran some other tests prior to going on jkm's rollers which measures the cars estimated bhp.(Cant remember what it was but something to do with air mass flow?) It came out 2bhp out.
So to see 2 stock cars pull stock factory figures, and claires came out near on exactly as they predicted, was some sort of proof that they are fairly accurate and not "Optimistic" as some other roads can be.
Remember she has only a map and nothing else, no exhaust , just standard so 290 teritory would be a reasonable estimate if she had those fitted.
We're back to this same old argument which will never be solved in anyones opinion.
Its not all about chasing "Big numbers" as at the end of the day, thats not the be all and end all.
If stock cars were running alot below stock horsepower then i would agree that jkm's DD rollers could be questionable. But in 3 outings, not one has been uncomprehendable.
If Been on Regals Rollers and didnt take there 251bhp on a stock car as realistic that they gave me. I refuse to believe it.Although torque readings WERE identical at both Locations.
But these are of course my own oppinion so whether anyone doesnt agree well, ill come kick em and nick all their Bourbans from their biscuit Barrels, so be warned
