Make a donation

Author Topic: Mk5 gti v Fabia VRS  (Read 5621 times)

Offline Janner_Sy

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 62
  • -Receive: 113
  • Posts: 5392
Re: Mk5 gti v Fabia VRS
« Reply #15 on: January 31, 2012, 09:56:47 pm »
The 1st 1.4tsi i drove was in a mk5 golf when they were first released.

I wasn't that impressed with it, which is why i was a bit shocked when this skoda one flew by.

Mind you its alot of weight in a mk5 for that little engine to pull!!



Less power and no dsg as well

Offline Greeners

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 201
  • -Receive: 199
  • Posts: 8812
    • Email
Re: Mk5 gti v Fabia VRS
« Reply #16 on: January 31, 2012, 10:00:37 pm »
I've been in a standard one and although quick off the mark, mid range and motorway speeds it struggled.....

Offline Janner_Sy

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 62
  • -Receive: 113
  • Posts: 5392
Re: Mk5 gti v Fabia VRS
« Reply #17 on: January 31, 2012, 10:03:45 pm »
Still not Eddie quick  :laugh: standard or mapped!

However...I'm trying my hardest to get my mrs to buy a bocenegra Cupra  :drool:
Still not Eddie quick  :laugh: standard or mapped!:
Not a stage2+ eddy that's in another league but a full stage 2 1.4TSI wouldn't be embarassed by a stage 2 eddy.  Your only talking around a 10hp per ton difference.  Stage 1 eddy would be very close and probably only quicker above 3 figures.

Ask hurdy he'll back that up

Offline Hurdy

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 52
  • -Receive: 137
  • Posts: 7683
Re: Mk5 gti v Fabia VRS
« Reply #18 on: January 31, 2012, 10:41:55 pm »
Someone mention my name :laugh:

Greeners is right, standard they don't have a lot of grunt over 70mph.

Mapped is a different matter.

Before the Water meth i had 236bhp and 267lbft with full bolt-ons in the Polo GTI (same engine and box as vRS)and the weight is now nearing 1150kg with half a tank of fuel (but not me) in it.

5.1 seconds easily and repeatable 0-60mph and 0-100mph in justy over 13 seconds.

With the water/meth on I reckon I'm between 250 and 260bhp and 280-290lbft of torque.

Power to weight is probably around 225bhp/ton, so for a MKV DSG to have the same power to weight it would need around 320bhp.

Also remember that these little terriers have a supercharger to aid power and torque off the line and tighter stacked gear ratios too. They also come with the MKVI GTI electronic diff system to help with traction off the line.

All-in-all a mightily impressive little motor. :driver:

GTI looks good too.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2012, 10:45:36 pm by Hurdy »
Golf R gone.

Offline JackG

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 33
  • -Receive: 31
  • Posts: 1064
  • aint nuttin to it but to do it.
    • Distinct Detailing
Re: Mk5 gti v Fabia VRS
« Reply #19 on: January 31, 2012, 11:04:05 pm »
To be honest I'm being biast  :signLOL: I work with the polo gti alot at work and standard there nippy so can't comment on a mapped one but I wish I could  :party: might even be worth having a "Revo GTi polo" on the pitch just for me  :driver:

www.distinctdetailing.co.uk
visit website for current offers!

Offline Janner_Sy

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 62
  • -Receive: 113
  • Posts: 5392
Re: Mk5 gti v Fabia VRS
« Reply #20 on: January 31, 2012, 11:33:04 pm »
This engine is so much more lively below 100mph than a KO4 TFSI and that's where 99.9% of driving is conducted.  Evenon track there's not a huge advantage in the power