General > Photography Section
Bird photography
RedRobin:
--- Quote from: richwig83 on March 21, 2014, 12:03:52 am ---
Not again robin..... ive heard enough of that for a lifetime. :happy2:
--- End quote ---
....Each to their own, Rich. I have shown that I can take both razor-sharp photos and arty ones. Photography, whether of birds or any other subject, can be a technically pristine or an evocative image (or both) - They are both equally valid, imo. Do you not agree with that?
Yes, I would have loved to have captured my last posted photo as a razor-sharp one but I failed at that spontaneously grabbed attempt. But it doesn't mean that the result can't still be enjoyed for different reasons.
If you don't agree then please understand that I do respect your different approach and am not trying to suggest you are wrong - We are simply different in our attitudes towards photography (and music! but much less so about cars).
:drinking: :happy2:
rich83:
I am not being dragged into another debate robin. My point was about image stabilisation and shutter speed.
RedRobin:
--- Quote from: richwig83 on March 21, 2014, 08:52:13 am ---
I am not being dragged into another debate robin. My point was about image stabilisation and shutter speed.
--- End quote ---
....I'm not seeking to drag you into a debate, Rich - I have already said that I think our individual approaches are different and each to their own and that I respect those differences.
You know me well enough by now I hope to realise that I am very open in expressing/sharing my views in what I post and don't expect everyone to agree with me.
It's just an open discussion prompted by the various images posted in this thread.
:happy2:
RedRobin:
House Sparrow_2751v1ns by RedRobin_05, on Flickr
rich83:
It's nothing to do with approach. I was talking about IS and shutter speed.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version