Make a donation

Author Topic: 99 Ron  (Read 5693 times)

Offline AndyS

  • Always Involved
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 6
  • -Receive: 5
  • Posts: 95
    • Email
Re: 99 Ron
« Reply #30 on: October 13, 2012, 10:25:57 am »
Does it not take the ECU a few days to adjust to the differant fuel  :surprised:

If it does, that would invalidate the test  :fighting:

Offline blackmagic

  • Always Involved
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 3
  • -Receive: 5
  • Posts: 95
Re: 99 Ron
« Reply #31 on: October 13, 2012, 11:18:52 am »
^^ what I said then.  :smiley:

Just to add at my work when a lot of the company cars were petrol. I tried vpower etc in a passat + skoda 1.8t which made a difference in performance. But in a 2.0 20v or 8v passat (none turbo) made no difference at all.

Most cars at work now tdi so can't do much testing since.
I think if you put it in a car designed for it or turbo then you'll get a gain else wouldn't bother.

Just what Ive found over the years. I'm only taking performance mind.

Try a few tanks and see what u think


Black GTI K03 Revo Stage 2+,

scottm72

  • Guest
Re: 99 Ron
« Reply #32 on: October 13, 2012, 04:16:02 pm »
I'd agree to an extent that using super unleaded can cause a placebo effect... However when I was on holiday my dad used my car and put half a tank or 95 in it. When I drove the car upon return it was noticeably flat between 4-5.5k revs and only found out later that day that he had put in 95 RON. It might not make a performance difference in the cars they tend to perform this test on (1.4 astras and the like) but it does in the GTI  :happy2:

watch this -------     

im sure it is better for the engine but would just like to see some evidence of that