All Things Mk5 > Revo Zone

Forge Twintake and Revo Stage 2+

<< < (8/9) > >>

RedRobin:

--- Quote from: chopper on December 08, 2012, 01:36:51 pm ---
pulled off the silicone pipe from engine side one of the canisters today (from behine light) and found loads of dust in the bend. Clearly the unoiled filter isnt up to scratch in catching all the dust. maybe the MAF is screwed now. that might explain why the low values 180-210 g/s on recent logs. ....
trying to fit an oiled  K&N conical filter in place of one the canisters is proving tricky, just due to its size , and the other canister in the way. will have to have a rethink this one....


--- End quote ---

....Just a thought (without reading the whole thread again): Did you buy your Twintake new or previously used?

If previously used, were the filters fitted the other way around from currently?

chopper:
got twintake brand new... fitted canisters right way round. never changed the orientation.

Itsagthing:
Interesting read guys looking at a intake for my ed30 and always loved the design style of the twintake but knowing its flow rate isn't that great maybe it's not the best choice.

RedRobin:

--- Quote from: Itsagthing on February 12, 2013, 07:39:28 am ---
Interesting read guys looking at a intake for my ed30 and always loved the design style of the twintake but knowing its flow rate isn't that great maybe it's not the best choice.


--- End quote ---

....I'm not setting out to defend any claimed "great flow rate" of the Twintake but I am both surprised and curious about you saying that.

Various independent (users) rolling-road and logging data do suggest or indicate that the ITG delivers more bhp but your comment suggests that the Twintake's flow rate is actually poor.

Can you expand on this, please?   :popcornsoda:

Itsagthing:

--- Quote from: RedRobin on February 12, 2013, 10:02:49 am ---
--- Quote from: Itsagthing on February 12, 2013, 07:39:28 am ---
Interesting read guys looking at a intake for my ed30 and always loved the design style of the twintake but knowing its flow rate isn't that great maybe it's not the best choice.


--- End quote ---

....I'm not setting out to defend any claimed "great flow rate" of the Twintake but I am both surprised and curious about you saying that.

Various independent (users) rolling-road and logging data do suggest or indicate that the ITG delivers more bhp but your comment suggests that the Twintake's flow rate is actually poor.

Can you expand on this, please?   :popcornsoda:


--- End quote ---
sorry yes poor if your trying to achieve over 370 plus bhp is what im referring too.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version