Make a donation

Author Topic: F10 M5 Contract hire  (Read 2630 times)

Offline Sunglasses Ron

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 11
  • -Receive: 15
  • Posts: 2067
    • Email
Re: F10 M5 Contract hire
« Reply #15 on: November 24, 2013, 09:33:25 pm »
Look up mitchy on the RS forums, he had one to replace his TTRS with. Was a short lived experience after his wife spun it, it couldn't match the mapped TTRS 1/4 mile times, and the engine blew up after a DMS map.

Really?!?!  :surprised: I didn't realise it blew up?!?! How did he stand with the dealer after that?  :confused:

I knew his Mrs got it a bit broadside coming off a RA, didn't realise she spun it? Not being funny, but to spin the car would involve turning all aids off and why would she do that if she was a bag of nerves driving it?  :confused: With traction/stability control on it wouldn't do anything of the sort.. There must be more to it if you ask me..

The only reason it wouldn't match his 1/4 mile times is down to traction and RWD.. Name me a practical 2wd car that would match an 11.3 1/4 mile this side of a Ferrari F12? On the move it wouldn't have any problem IMO and when mapped it would rip the TT a new one (if it doesn't blow up that is  :surprised:)..

Offline Tamiyoman

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 2
  • -Receive: 39
  • Posts: 1352
  • Prev car - Candy DSG ED30 No. 2235
    • Email
Re: F10 M5 Contract hire
« Reply #16 on: November 24, 2013, 10:03:17 pm »
My brother (Works for in the lease industry) was telling me last week about new M5 being 400+VAt per month, one of my mates recently sold his 2006 M5 and has asked my brother to sort one for him  :happy2:
MK7 Golf R, Pure White 3Dr DSG, Had since 10/06/14

Offline Poverty

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 36
  • -Receive: 21
  • Posts: 1543
Re: F10 M5 Contract hire
« Reply #17 on: November 25, 2013, 09:05:59 am »
Look up mitchy on the RS forums, he had one to replace his TTRS with. Was a short lived experience after his wife spun it, it couldn't match the mapped TTRS 1/4 mile times, and the engine blew up after a DMS map.

Really?!?!  :surprised: I didn't realise it blew up?!?! How did he stand with the dealer after that?  :confused:

I knew his Mrs got it a bit broadside coming off a RA, didn't realise she spun it? Not being funny, but to spin the car would involve turning all aids off and why would she do that if she was a bag of nerves driving it?  :confused: With traction/stability control on it wouldn't do anything of the sort.. There must be more to it if you ask me..

The only reason it wouldn't match his 1/4 mile times is down to traction and RWD.. Name me a practical 2wd car that would match an 11.3 1/4 mile this side of a Ferrari F12? On the move it wouldn't have any problem IMO and when mapped it would rip the TT a new one (if it doesn't blow up that is  :surprised:)..


BMW warranted it no question asked.

Yeah I was wondering that aswell, afaik she "spun" it with the kids in the car. Im sure those where Craig's words.

I've seen the performance figures of the m6 with the competition pack and it's basically as quick as the new turbo S, although some reckon the press cars supplied where BMW specials as the figures are just insane and don't match up with what the new m6 is achieving in the GTboard videos etc.

Winner: Porsche 911 Turbo S with new Sachsenring-laprecord for a production car.
0-100 kph: 2,8 s (wow #1)
0-200 kph: 9,6 s
0-300 kph: 29,7 s
Quarter mile: 10,7 s
Braking 200-0 kph: 127,7 m

Audi R8 V10 Plus S-tronic:
0-100 kph: 3,5 s
0-200 kph: 11,3 s
0-300 kph: 39,8 s
Braking 200-0 kph: 128,6 m

BMW M6 Competiton Package:
0-100 kph: 3,9 s
0-200 kph: 11,2 s
0-300 kph: 30,4 s (wow #2)
Braking 200-0 kph: 143,6 m

Nissan GT-R:
0-100 kph: 3,1 s (2,7 s... yeah sure)
0-200 kph: 10,8 s
0-300 kph: 35,7 s
Braking 200-0 kph: 129,4 m


Offline Sunglasses Ron

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 11
  • -Receive: 15
  • Posts: 2067
    • Email
Re: F10 M5 Contract hire
« Reply #18 on: November 25, 2013, 09:32:09 am »
Look up mitchy on the RS forums, he had one to replace his TTRS with. Was a short lived experience after his wife spun it, it couldn't match the mapped TTRS 1/4 mile times, and the engine blew up after a DMS map.

Really?!?!  :surprised: I didn't realise it blew up?!?! How did he stand with the dealer after that?  :confused:

I knew his Mrs got it a bit broadside coming off a RA, didn't realise she spun it? Not being funny, but to spin the car would involve turning all aids off and why would she do that if she was a bag of nerves driving it?  :confused: With traction/stability control on it wouldn't do anything of the sort.. There must be more to it if you ask me..

The only reason it wouldn't match his 1/4 mile times is down to traction and RWD.. Name me a practical 2wd car that would match an 11.3 1/4 mile this side of a Ferrari F12? On the move it wouldn't have any problem IMO and when mapped it would rip the TT a new one (if it doesn't blow up that is  :surprised:)..


BMW warranted it no question asked.

Yeah I was wondering that aswell, afaik she "spun" it with the kids in the car. Im sure those where Craig's words.

I've seen the performance figures of the m6 with the competition pack and it's basically as quick as the new turbo S, although some reckon the press cars supplied where BMW specials as the figures are just insane and don't match up with what the new m6 is achieving in the GTboard videos etc.

Winner: Porsche 911 Turbo S with new Sachsenring-laprecord for a production car.
0-100 kph: 2,8 s (wow #1)
0-200 kph: 9,6 s
0-300 kph: 29,7 s
Quarter mile: 10,7 s
Braking 200-0 kph: 127,7 m

Audi R8 V10 Plus S-tronic:
0-100 kph: 3,5 s
0-200 kph: 11,3 s
0-300 kph: 39,8 s
Braking 200-0 kph: 128,6 m

BMW M6 Competiton Package:
0-100 kph: 3,9 s
0-200 kph: 11,2 s
0-300 kph: 30,4 s (wow #2)
Braking 200-0 kph: 143,6 m

Nissan GT-R:
0-100 kph: 3,1 s (2,7 s... yeah sure)
0-200 kph: 10,8 s
0-300 kph: 35,7 s
Braking 200-0 kph: 129,4 m



Doesn't surprise me to be honest judging by this (non competition pack M6).



Offline Deako

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 38
  • -Receive: 44
  • Posts: 1655
  • Eat, Sleep....VAG
Re: F10 M5 Contract hire
« Reply #19 on: November 25, 2013, 02:52:29 pm »
Some great deals out there on M5 leasing at the moment. It wouldnt take much convincing if i was in the market for a bigger car.
#1493

Offline Scottymon

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 83
  • -Receive: 125
  • Posts: 2139
  • UnNaturally Aspirated
  • My Ride: http://www.voodish.co.uk/misc/6n/6n-alive1.jpg
Re: F10 M5 Contract hire
« Reply #20 on: November 25, 2013, 02:58:17 pm »
A lot of the BMW and Merc. lease pricing seem very good value for money when comparing against a comparable "lesser" brand... must be to do with value of the car at the end of the term.  For example you can lease a BM 330D F30 for the same as a Ford Mondeo 2.2TDCI . :rolleye:

Offline Poverty

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 36
  • -Receive: 21
  • Posts: 1543
Re: F10 M5 Contract hire
« Reply #21 on: November 25, 2013, 03:11:58 pm »
True got a friend with a 507 edition c63 coupe and he pays 450 a month over 2 years. Not bad at all, at that price I'd get one for the GF but she's worried about getting carjacked as she works in a rough area lol :(

Offline Deako

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 38
  • -Receive: 44
  • Posts: 1655
  • Eat, Sleep....VAG
Re: F10 M5 Contract hire
« Reply #22 on: November 25, 2013, 03:26:45 pm »
Surely thats business lease prices on the C63?
#1493

Offline Poverty

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 36
  • -Receive: 21
  • Posts: 1543
Re: F10 M5 Contract hire
« Reply #23 on: November 25, 2013, 03:56:55 pm »
Could very well be but I've seen personal ones for 499 a month before with 5k deposit

Offline tony_danza

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 3
  • -Receive: 112
  • Posts: 3013
  • The voice of objective reason, but mine's best.
Re: F10 M5 Contract hire
« Reply #24 on: November 25, 2013, 08:45:28 pm »
Aye, they're really trying to get people into them, so there's a healthy stock of 'used with a bit of warranty' for resale in 2 years - where they'll make a tonne of money back (or, so is the gamble).

I'd happily smash around in an M5. Likewise an XF-RS.
Sideways yo!

Offline Oli

  • Won't Shut up.
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 19
  • -Receive: 10
  • Posts: 835
  • living the dream....
    • Email
Re: F10 M5 Contract hire
« Reply #25 on: November 25, 2013, 09:48:57 pm »
This is exactly what they are doing, not many people want to pay £75k+ for a super saloon, so get the depreciation paid, and top up the used market.

And our RS is in for some warranty work at present and we have an A6 all-road as a courtesy car, and my wife hates having a big car, so the M5 is off the radar!!  Shame, as Id have liked to try one, for a couple of years!  Looks like we will wait for the new RS3 :driver:
www.bmvs-camperhire.co.uk - Brand new VW California SE rental