General > Product Reviews

Polo 1.0 SE Review

<< < (2/2)

Hunzeracol:
I do not think there is anything special about this.

willni:
To defend the polo as I have the 1.4 85bhp version. It is a courtesy car and as we all know they get raked by everyone so could explain the gearbox, and I've actually said and would still do my polo is comfier than my mk5 golf, but there's definately a difference is build quality between the two the golf is far better built.

pudding:
0-60 in 16.5 seconds! Whoa, steady on!  Some of the slower book figures surprise me actually.  I rented a boggo 1.6 Astra once and it 'felt' a lot faster than the 12 second book speed suggested.

Speaking of Polos.....there's always a new shape one glued to my bumper these days, usually driven by angry looking young men trying to prove a Polo is just as quick, if not quicker than a Golf.  Makes me chuckle.  I had to put a Polo GTI driver in his place the other day when his ridiculous tailgating at 80mph was getting dangerous.  Sorry Polo boy, but you're no match for a remapped Eddy.  Try again when you've fed your engine some more minerals.

Tazocin:

--- Quote from: Pudding on May 31, 2017, 04:16:39 pm ---0-60 in 16.5 seconds! Whoa, steady on!  Some of the slower book figures surprise me actually.  I rented a boggo 1.6 Astra once and it 'felt' a lot faster than the 12 second book speed suggested.

Speaking of Polos.....there's always a new shape one glued to my bumper these days, usually driven by angry looking young men trying to prove a Polo is just as quick, if not quicker than a Golf.  Makes me chuckle.  I had to put a Polo GTI driver in his place the other day when his ridiculous tailgating at 70mph was getting dangerous.  Sorry Polo boy, but you're no match for a remapped Eddy.  Try again when you've fed your engine some more minerals.

--- End quote ---

FTFY  :wink:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page