MK5 Golf GTI
General => Product Reviews => Topic started by: SteveP on December 05, 2009, 04:15:44 pm
-
Why
As the DSG gearbox is produced for the mass market of owners it's not going to be coded in a way that either best suits every driver's style or is designed in the way of making the most from the gearbox/engine combination. I think there is always going to be a bigger safty margin built in.
This said I was initially quiet skeptical about the benefits of DSG software upgrades when the news from the USA started to emerge about the likes of the very expensive HPA software upgrades.
But once the software started to appear over here and a certain Mr "mod mental" Hurdy got an upgrade from a different company I started to do some more research and then fully understood the benefits this can provide, not only modified cars like mine but any DSG based car.
So once i heard the worst keep secret of a few other owner having software from Revo and my previous remap supplier confirmed they had no immediate plans to do anything in this area I choice to swap remap providers ready for when their software became available.
(Top tip, never pop in to see Carl or Kev at Revo for a chat about DSG software as it can be very damaging to your wallet but makes one hell of the car :laugh: :laugh:)
So once the production version of the software was finally made available I made my way over to Daventry to get the Stage 2 version of their software applied.
They currently offer the Stage 2 version for the K04 Stage 2+ or Big Turbo 2.0 TFSI cars.
Sourcing
Available directly from Revo or from their network of dealers. Full details can be found here - http://www.revotechnik.com/
This software has a Spectacular Introductory Special Offer: up to 31st December 2009 - 50% off the normal RRP for existing Revo customers: -
DSG (Stage1) £149 + VAT
DSG (Stage2) £199 + VAT
The software can also be used along side any other remap and for non Revo customers costs: -
DSG (Stage1) £299 + VAT
DSG (Stage2) £399 + VAT
Fitting
Normal laptop plug-in and wait while the software is downloaded.
Very easy process and just enough time to have a coffee and chat about what to spend your money on next.
Other versions
DSG Software is also available from the likes of GIAC and HPA at present.
Plus Points
Pretty much the feature list of the software: -
- No kick down in Manual Mode
- No forced change up in Manual mode plus a 7400 rpm redline
- Improved torque handling (increased to 500nm)
- Increased shift speed
- More "sportier" characteristics to the D and S modes (only effecting full throttle)
- Increase Launch Control limit to 4000rpm
- Rest of the flash counter when the software is applied
Another plus point is the additional power that has been released at the top of the rev range, with a remapped K04 car and the standard DSG software you will see the car forces the gear change at 6000rpm (with it pulling things back just before this in preparation for the change, typically my peak reading came at 5850 rpm), now you can cleanly rev past 7000rpm, so taking my recent dyno plot below you will see around another 15bhp is found at the top end.
(https://www.mk5golfgti.co.uk/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdaz.co%2Fmedia%2Fkk207%2FStevep_010%2FGolfGtiEdn30_X50_DSG_ITG.jpg&hash=66d3ffb2e1b42da74c826c671abaf66d00f2bd5a)
Minus Points
To me there is real no minus points or negative aspects as such to this upgrade, the one small comment I would make is the increased shift speed does very slightly reduce the infamous DSG "barp" noise on gear changes.
The only other consideration is the normal impact to your warranty :smiley:
Summary
So in summary I have now driven most day to day road scenarios I can think of and am delighted with the difference this had made to the car overall (nearly 2k miles on the production version of the software now)
The improvements in the manual mode are one of the top three best changes I have made to the car and believe this is how they should come out of the factory.
The car just feels more natural to drive now and really bridges the gap between the driver involvement of a manual car but with the benefits of an "auto" style box for more normal every day driving.
The way you can "bang" through the gears is amazing and the way you can downshift a gear much higher in the rev than before sounds great with the throttle "blip" when decelerating from higher speeds.
The "sportier" improvements to D mode have also really surprised me, I didn't have a very high expectation of these changes but have been really surprised how much better this mode has become in general, it's now feels more reactive in the right kind of way but doesn't affect the ability to cruise around all day in a "driving miss daisy" style if you so wished.
So I can really say I would highly recommend this to any owner with the superiour DSG gearbox, this will realy improve your car no matter what (if any) performance software you may have on your car.
:happy2:
-
Two reviews in one day.....you are spoiling us Steve :laugh:
As usual a great review, but who is this "mod mental" person you are talking about :innocent:
I'm awaiting the return of my car next week and will be keen to see whether or not I need to swap from GIAC to REVO or not :wink:
-
....
Great and full review. Sounds like a must-have! :wink:
-
Nice review, sounds a must for the k04 car :happy2:
-
any owner with the superiour DSG gearbox
Nice write up but where can I find one of these... :wink: :smiley:
-
Nice review, sounds a must for the k04 car :happy2:
....And hopefully someone will post a review for the K03 car in due course - What Revo call DSG Stage1. :happy2:
-
Nice review, sounds a must for the k04 car :happy2:
....And hopefully someone will post a review for the K03 car in due course - What Revo call DSG Stage1. :happy2:
Is there any point with the k03 as it doesnt make the power at higher Rpm's?
-
well u get the benefit of a "slightly" faster shift speed i guess, but i agree the whole point of the DSG remap in my view was to unleash the top end power that was sitting there waiting to be had on those K04 cars with S2+. You could see the difference it made clearly at the recent RR day we had down south. K03 runs out of puff soon after 5k rpm so no point in doing this mod really.
Me and Neil M had a giggle over what another supplier offered in terms of DSG Remap (well it didn't allow the car to rev past the OEM change up setting for starters!) but hey ho he and car owner were happy with the after effects! :signLOL:
-
The real benefit for k03 cars is the manual mode being just that, manual witout auto upshifting.
-
The real benefit for k03 cars is the manual mode being just that, manual witout auto upshifting.
I can however see the point of the sometimes annoying kick down when you dont want it.
Fingers crossed Bluefin do something as that will be a Mod i would consider most deffinatly.
-
The real benefit for k03 cars is the manual mode being just that, manual witout auto upshifting.
....Exactly that. It's also smoother on gearshifts and especially noticeable on 1st to 2nd to 3rd. But mine is still the pre-public release Stage1 version from March. Steve's review here is about stage2.
I usually shift gear at close to 5,000 revs anyway.
-
You should find the stage 1 map is also a little "sportier" in gear selection in D than standard.
-
nice Steve , I'm very jealous of you DSG owners, best of all worlds (quicker/higher torque limits) (until it breaks)
amazing how the manual vs dsg debate shifted.
I would be interested to learn more about how REVO achieve these results and whether any of these effect the component lifespans ?
e.g. increased torque limit , hows that done? (pump pressure I believe), will kit reduce the life of the pump?
higher rev limit , is the std drivetrain up to it? (edit : valves / pistons / rods etc )
how much extra does this extend you mph change points?
also would you recommend a DSG oil change prior to having this done?
John
-
You should find the stage 1 map is also a little "sportier" in gear selection in D than standard.
....Oooh, that'll be nice! I don't often use D but would prefer it sportier without being as strong as S-mode.
:happy2:
-
nice Steve , I'm very jealous of you DSG owners, best of all worlds (quicker/higher torque limits) (until it breaks)
amazing how the manual vs dsg debate shifted.
I would be interested to learn more about how REVO achieve these results and whether any of these effect the component lifespans ?
e.g. increased torque limit , hows that done? (pump pressure I believe), will kit reduce the life of the pump?
higher rev limit , is the std drivetrain up to it?
how much extra does this extend you mph change points?
also would you recommend a DSG oil change prior to having this done?
John
....I had a long list of exactly those questions plus more when I was first asked to test. Revo didn't give me any specific answers except to reassure me that all would be ok and asking me to give them feedback.
I think the principles of how the DSG software works is very similar to the remapping of the ECU and Revo take very special care to keep everything within safe parameters. If they were to take risks in such aspects and something went wrong it would be extremely expensive for the good reputation on which they trade. But it would still be interesting to know - Just don't hold your breath.
Strangely enough I think that DSG boxes might even be more durable because of all the self-protective mechanisms.
-
I will soon be getting the Revo done on my Ed30. Could I get the DSG map done straight away? Does it cost extra, or is it just the same as Stage1?
-
The REVO stage 2 takes about 15 minutes to download and then a test drive for 10 mins just to check that all is well.
As Steve originally says until the end of the year the Stage 2 DSG map is £199+VAT.
The engine performance software is different to this and is around £550 with an SPS+ controller. :smiley: :tree:
-
Looking to get this done soon - but still unclear of the key difference between the stage 1 and 2 for DSG?
cheers
ed
-
Looking to get this done soon - but still unclear of the key difference between the stage 1 and 2 for DSG?
cheers
ed
....Basically, if you are running a K03 turbo, get Stage1 and if a K04, then Stage2.
-
great, thanks.
-
Steve,
Fantastic write up man ! :congrats:
I love reading your reviews ! :smiley:
The only bloody problem i have - I can't get it !!!! - Pirelli DSG is different to that of ED30 :sad1:
-
It won't be long until the latest CAN version of the DSG box will have software available :happy2:
-
Steve,
Fantastic write up man ! :congrats:
I love reading your reviews ! :smiley:
The only bloody problem i have - I can't get it !!!! - Pirelli DSG is different to that of ED30 :sad1:
Whats different about it? I thought all the boxes were the same accross the GTI platforms???
-
^^ i think its something to do with a later Mechatronics unit Nath
-
^^ i think its something to do with a later Mechatronics unit Nath
Ah! So do they use this later mechatronics when they replace the older version under warranty?
-
That i dont know :popcornsoda:
-
Nope it's not the mechantronics, it's the communications protocol.
The late 2008 cars like the Pirelli use a can bus based system where as the original ones (like mine) use the older style K-line comms. :smiley:
-
Nope it's not the mechantronics, it's the communications protocol.
The late 2008 cars like the Pirelli use a can bus based system where as the original ones (like mine) use the older style K-line comms. :smiley:
Interesting stuff, ta :happy2:
-
Nope it's not the mechantronics, it's the communications protocol.
The late 2008 cars like the Pirelli use a can bus based system where as the original ones (like mine) use the older style K-line comms. :smiley:
Steve,
Please forgive me, but can you explain what CAN means & K-Line mean ?
-
Nope it's not the mechantronics, it's the communications protocol.
The late 2008 cars like the Pirelli use a can bus based system where as the original ones (like mine) use the older style K-line comms. :smiley:
:confused: :confused: :confused:
way above my head.....
right off to watch more Discovery :wink:
-
Nope it's not the mechantronics, it's the communications protocol.
The late 2008 cars like the Pirelli use a can bus based system where as the original ones (like mine) use the older style K-line comms. :smiley:
Steve,
Please forgive me, but can you explain what CAN means & K-Line mean ?
It's the language the car's ECU communicates to the gearbox with, CAN is the latest technology that is becoming more common and is what the rest of the car mainly uses.
-
Nope it's not the mechantronics, it's the communications protocol.
The late 2008 cars like the Pirelli use a can bus based system where as the original ones (like mine) use the older style K-line comms. :smiley:
Steve,
Please forgive me, but can you explain what CAN means & K-Line mean ?
It's the language the car's ECU communicates to the gearbox with, CAN is the latest technology that is becoming more common and is what the rest of the car mainly uses.
SteveP, DomT and Bacillus can also use this form of communication when speaking to each other. :laugh:
Geeeeks :P
-
:jumpmove: :signLOL: :jumpmove:
-
Nope it's not the mechantronics, it's the communications protocol.
The late 2008 cars like the Pirelli use a can bus based system where as the original ones (like mine) use the older style K-line comms. :smiley:
Steve,
Please forgive me, but can you explain what CAN means & K-Line mean ?
It's the language the car's ECU communicates to the gearbox with, CAN is the latest technology that is becoming more common and is what the rest of the car mainly uses.
What are the benifits of CAN technology as averse to K-Line ?
-
^^^ I knew that was coming :laugh: :laugh:
In terms of the DSG gearbox I would there is probably no noticable benefit (from the driver or performance point of view), I suspect the later cars use the can bus protocal as this is the standard, so most things within the car that are electronically controlled communicate via the can bus protocal.
If you want to get really geekie then check wikipedia :fighting2:
-
I would be interested to learn more about how REVO achieve these results and whether any of these effect the component lifespans ?
Me too - but I don't think Revo would be too keen on giving away their hard earned 'trade secrets'. :P
e.g. increased torque limit , hows that done? (pump pressure I believe), will kit reduce the life of the pump?
higher rev limit , is the std drivetrain up to it? (edit : valves / pistons / rods etc )
how much extra does this extend you mph change points?
I think the publisised 'torque limitations' on the 6-speed DSGs (max 350Nm) have been well and truely dashed - what torque is Hurdy now pushing?
Regarding 'pump pressure' - I don't actually think they can increase the oil presure - I reckon what they do is simply increase the speed of actuation of the electro-hydraulic valves and pistons (which 'release' each clutch pack). I doub't there is any change in speed in which the actual gear cogs engage - because the DSG works on a 'pre-select' principle.
And onto the potential damage to the engine (valves, pistons, rods, etc) - well these will be protected by the rev-limiter in the engine ECU - so the DSG remap shouldn't technically affect this.
also would you recommend a DSG oil change prior to having this done?
As with anything relating to modifications - if there is any potential likelyhood of said modification affecting the durability or longevity, then a reduction in service intervals should be highly advisable. So in real terms, if you have an engine remap and a DSG remap, and drive according to proscribed performance gains, then I would personally strongly recommend halving the DSGs standard scheduled oil & filter change from 40k miles down to 20k miles. Don't forget, on a standard DSG fluid change, you don't actually completely drain the box - there is still a residual of just under 2 litres of the old fluid in there (DSG fluid change is approx 5.5 litres, whereas full from dry is 7.2 litres).
-
Nope it's not the mechantronics, it's the communications protocol.
The late 2008 cars like the Pirelli use a can bus based system where as the original ones (like mine) use the older style K-line comms. :smiley:
Are you sure the DSG is K-line controlled? I thought all modules on the Mk5 were CAN-BUS controlled - as is evident when carrying out an 'Auto detect' VCDS scan. Ironically, my B7 RS4 does not auto detect - which means that some modules are non-CAN . . . . :confused:
-
Nope it's not the mechantronics, it's the communications protocol.
The late 2008 cars like the Pirelli use a can bus based system where as the original ones (like mine) use the older style K-line comms. :smiley:
Steve,
Please forgive me, but can you explain what CAN means & K-Line mean ?
It's the language the car's ECU communicates to the gearbox with, CAN is the latest technology that is becoming more common and is what the rest of the car mainly uses.
What are the benifits of CAN technology as averse to K-Line ?
Hmmmm . . . I'm not 100% up to speed on electronics protocols (so forgive me for any errors/cock-ups), but basically K-line could best be described in laymans terms as 'analogue', whilst CAN-BUS could be described as 'digital'.
K-line - uses full voltage/current transmissions over copper wires.
CAN-BUS - CAN means Controller Area Network, and it utilises a 'BUS' which is basically a kind of 'master artery', usually fibre optic, which replaces many individual separate copper wires. The BUS can support multiple packets of dual-direction communication, and the BUS can also support a multiple number of simultaneous communications (basically, the BUS can cope with say fuel sender information at the same time as brake lights, at the same time as electric windows, and so on). CAN generates (and recieves) minute 'pulses' of electricity along the BUS to a CAN-enabled receiver ECU (a pulse to turn on a brake light, a pulse to engergise the fuel pump; and can recieve a pulse FROM the brake light [that the bulb is actually illuminating], or a pulse from the fuel sender for the level of fuel).
So with K-line, you are restricted to the limitations of copper wires, but with CAN-BUS, there are absolutely no limitations - which is why modern CAN cars may have upto 80 or more separate ECUs.
HTH
-
Nope it's not the mechantronics, it's the communications protocol.
The late 2008 cars like the Pirelli use a can bus based system where as the original ones (like mine) use the older style K-line comms. :smiley:
Are you sure the DSG is K-line controlled? I thought all modules on the Mk5 were CAN-BUS controlled - as is evident when carrying out an 'Auto detect' VCDS scan. Ironically, my B7 RS4 does not auto detect - which means that some modules are non-CAN . . . . :confused:
Yeah, the DSG uses K-line.
Steve jr at Statllers had no end of trouble trying to connect to the TCU due to this when he loaded the GIAC DSG software. :happy2:
Oh and the last dyno at Awesome threw up 415lbft!!! :scared:
-
I often find that DSG cars that have REVO DSG software make much better torque figures on my dyno than DSG ones that have no transmission software.
-
Oh and the last dyno at Awesome threw up 415lbft!!! :scared:
....What would worry me about that is how torque is said to be the DSG killer. Surely you wouldn't want any more torque than that, John.
The DSG box is apparently the same in both K03 GTI and K04 Ed30.
-
I often find that DSG cars that have REVO DSG software make much better torque figures on my dyno than DSG ones that have no transmission software.
....But isn't that partly because remapped DSG boxes allow an easier dyno run without shift interference?
-
WhoooooOOOSH cabang! Look who has graced us with his presence. (https://www.mk5golfgti.co.uk/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdaz.co%2Fmedia%2Ftomashandmilly%2FDaft_stuff%2FBTLC3a.gif&hash=a3459669db07dd206bde42acee5e9a5c7a2d3d45)
I just mentioned you yesterday. :scared: Werz ya bin. :star:
-
I often find that DSG cars that have REVO DSG software make much better torque figures on my dyno than DSG ones that have no transmission software.
....But isn't that partly because remapped DSG boxes allow an easier dyno run without shift interference?
If I compare 2 dyno runs from the same car with same engine software, the later graph with the DSG software produces an extra 20ft/lb. No interference from shifting.
-
I often find that DSG cars that have REVO DSG software make much better torque figures on my dyno than DSG ones that have no transmission software.
....But isn't that partly because remapped DSG boxes allow an easier dyno run without shift interference?
If I compare 2 dyno runs from the same car with same engine software, the later graph with the DSG software produces an extra 20ft/lb. No interference from shifting.
....There can't be a better comparison than that :drinking:. I am of assuming same day dyno and therefore temperatures etc (doubtless goes without saying).
-
Nope it's not the mechantronics, it's the communications protocol.
The late 2008 cars like the Pirelli use a can bus based system where as the original ones (like mine) use the older style K-line comms. :smiley:
Are you sure the DSG is K-line controlled? I thought all modules on the Mk5 were CAN-BUS controlled - as is evident when carrying out an 'Auto detect' VCDS scan. Ironically, my B7 RS4 does not auto detect - which means that some modules are non-CAN . . . . :confused:
Yeah, the DSG uses K-line.
Steve jr at Statllers had no end of trouble trying to connect to the TCU due to this when he loaded the GIAC DSG software. :happy2:
Oh and the last dyno at Awesome threw up 415lbft!!! :scared:
What's that in Nm. :wink:
-
WhoooooOOOSH cabang! Look who has graced us with his presence. (https://www.mk5golfgti.co.uk/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdaz.co%2Fmedia%2Ftomashandmilly%2FDaft_stuff%2FBTLC3a.gif&hash=a3459669db07dd206bde42acee5e9a5c7a2d3d45)
I just mentioned you yesterday. :scared: Werz ya bin. :star:
You must have set my ears on fire . . . . :laugh: :laugh:
-
If I compare 2 dyno runs from the same car with same engine software, the later graph with the DSG software produces an extra 20ft/lb. No interference from shifting.
Don't understand that???
The software only prevents change up at 6.3k(ish) rpm but peak torque is produced much further down the rev range.
Care to explain?