Make a donation

Author Topic: 95 vs 99 ron - Worth the extra cost  (Read 4934 times)

Offline f00glee

  • Always Involved
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 5
  • -Receive: 26
  • Posts: 268
Re: 95 vs 99 ron - Worth the extra cost
« Reply #15 on: September 18, 2017, 09:09:41 pm »
Even before having mine stage 1 mapped (now requires 99RON exclusively). I only ever used V power or tesco momentum 99. BP ultimate is 97, not 99.

I think the consensus is that it makes some difference in terms of MPG even on a std map so you may break even with cost. Other benefits of cleaning agents etc play a factor too.

Now I'm mapped and pre cat out, I regularly see 45 mpg on a 15 mile trip up the A10 near Cambridge (sat at 50 mph). Long term average is approaching 35mpg and an 80mph motorway run for any kind of distance returns ~38mpg. Pretty happy with these numbers  :happy2:

Is your map really 99 specific?  Must have a lot of timing!  I can use 95 on my stage 1 tune no probs and have done many times :smiley:

Good mpg.  I never drive slow enough to see anything above 30 on the short term average, but my long term average is hanging around 31mpg at the moment.  Was 27 before I replaced the cam sensor  :smiley:

I would assume so. The guys at r tech request 99RON fuel before mapping so I guess that's what the map is based on!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Current:
Mk6 R, Tornado Red, 5-door, '13.
Previous:
Mk5 GTI, Tornado Red, 3-door, '06, R-tech Stage "1+"

Offline pudding

  • Global Moderator
  • Just look at my post count
  • *
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 2
  • -Receive: 690
  • Posts: 8353
Re: 95 vs 99 ron - Worth the extra cost
« Reply #16 on: September 19, 2017, 02:16:41 pm »
Don't R-Tech maps come with 5 switchable maps for lower octane?


2007 ED30 | 2009 TDI 140 | 2016 BMW 330D

Offline f00glee

  • Always Involved
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 5
  • -Receive: 26
  • Posts: 268
Re: 95 vs 99 ron - Worth the extra cost
« Reply #17 on: September 19, 2017, 05:09:06 pm »
Don't R-Tech maps come with 5 switchable maps for lower octane?

You're right about the switchable maps being present, but for me octane wasn't a consideration/ever mentioned (other than specifying 99 had to be in the tank). I wanted to be able to drop the power temporarily if my clutch starts to struggle at some point in the future (std clutch) or if I have to let someone else drive for any reason...

For me map 1 is "stock" power, 4 has torque capped below 300lbft and 5 delivers the full beans 320odd lbft. 2 and 3 aren't so much "proper" maps - just map 4 again with further reduced boost levels to bring the torque down even more. HP comes down with the reduced torque. Obviously the car sits in 5 99.9% of the time :D though it is fun dropping it into map 1 for a few minutes to be reminded how much oomph has been gained.

Sorry for the slight thread hijack!






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Current:
Mk6 R, Tornado Red, 5-door, '13.
Previous:
Mk5 GTI, Tornado Red, 3-door, '06, R-tech Stage "1+"

Offline Molesy

  • Always Involved
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 16
  • -Receive: 7
  • Posts: 111
    • Email
Re: 95 vs 99 ron - Worth the extra cost
« Reply #18 on: September 19, 2017, 06:54:09 pm »
My car lives on Shell Nitro+, i can tell the difference with other cheaper supermarket fuels so they only go in if nothing else is around. I'm lucky that I drive past a Shell, Esso and BP on the way to work and the Shell is generally the cheapest!

Offline gtipirelli

  • Always Involved
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 7
  • Posts: 201
  • Golf GTi Pirelli
    • Email
Re: 95 vs 99 ron - Worth the extra cost
« Reply #19 on: September 19, 2017, 07:28:58 pm »
I have a mapped Pirelli edition and it just feels flat on 95 Ron fuel. It really takes off on momentum 99 so always use that

No idea if I get better mpg. The performance on tap is more important
Golf GTi Pirelli - Diamond Black, 5 Door - SOLD
now 718 Cayman S PDK