I have loads of RR graphs now of the other 2 brands, and its by far better than the superchips, it holds the torque much better, as superchips backs straight off as soon as it has peaked, whereas this one stays constant.
This is my Superchips stage 3 graph.I would say it is fairly healthy without any backing off anywhere.
Quote from: Hedge on February 09, 2011, 06:43:42 amThis is my Superchips stage 3 graph.I would say it is fairly healthy without any backing off anywhere. Thats a great looking graph but very low numbers for stage 3.....
the key thing is this was JKMs dyno not superchips or AMDs so figures are not inflated. And as said by Ian, it was in amongst the REVO stage 2+ cars highest ever stage 2+ iirc on JKM'S rollers was 330Hp
Quote from: Janner_Sy on February 09, 2011, 08:12:43 pmthe key thing is this was JKMs dyno not superchips or AMDs so figures are not inflated. And as said by Ian, it was in amongst the REVO stage 2+ cars highest ever stage 2+ iirc on JKM'S rollers was 330HpI was going to say... JKMs read fairly true! Hedge.. that power graph is A-Mazingly smooth
Oops... same make of RR though.
Quote from: richwig83 on February 09, 2011, 08:26:14 pmOops... same make of RR though.Same as PDT, RS Tuning and many many others
In reality I reckon the SC 3 map on hedge's car had more than 327bhp that day IF he had the DSG map to allow it to rev further up. You can see the power line is still climbing when it got cut off by the auto change. So imo it could have achieved 335/340bhp at something nearer 7k rpm. Still the map on the car looks good tho per that dyno run.