Make a donation

Author Topic: Autotech vs APR HPFP  (Read 52738 times)

Offline Bernhard30

  • Always Involved
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 2
  • -Receive: 16
  • Posts: 316
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #45 on: February 28, 2012, 11:31:33 pm »
Was just wondering what the 'life expectancy' of these APR pumps are? Anyone have a thought.

Running Revo St2+ with autotech 'internals' and all seems fine but was just curious as to whether the APR option is possibly longer lasting than autotech option perhaps may be.

In my head that would be one of the factors for perhaps swapping units.

Offline Jussa

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 23
  • -Receive: 12
  • Posts: 1051
  • Bicester
    • Email
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #46 on: February 28, 2012, 11:40:54 pm »
That's why I'm asking.
I have the Autotech internals now, but thinking about doing the upgrade to APR purely for longevity as my car is a keeper  :innocent:
2010 3dr phantom black S-Tronic S3 - BCS TBE with 3½" DP - LOBA LO4xx turbo - LOBA HPFP - Revo CAI - H&R 25mm lowering springs - Forge 11mm spacers - RS4 fuel Pressure valve - THS intercooler - H&R front and rear ARB's - AEM water methanol injection

Offline GarethB

  • Won't Shut up.
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 10
  • -Receive: 16
  • Posts: 628
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #47 on: February 29, 2012, 05:30:05 am »
I'm quite torn on this....

On one hand, you have PDT stating that he's never seen a problem with the autotech internals after many many installs  :happy2:

On the other, you have tuners, such as JKM who will no longer install the internals and will only fit the full APR pump  :scared:


Offline Jussa

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 23
  • -Receive: 12
  • Posts: 1051
  • Bicester
    • Email
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #48 on: February 29, 2012, 05:35:58 am »
Exactly, and Awesome GTi were the same.  I turned up there with the internals and they didn't want to fit them!!!
It was only because I drove up all the way from London that they made an exception for me......they even had to call the managing director to get permission to do it  :confused:
2010 3dr phantom black S-Tronic S3 - BCS TBE with 3½" DP - LOBA LO4xx turbo - LOBA HPFP - Revo CAI - H&R 25mm lowering springs - Forge 11mm spacers - RS4 fuel Pressure valve - THS intercooler - H&R front and rear ARB's - AEM water methanol injection

Offline 56OctyVRS

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 39
  • -Receive: 72
  • Posts: 1003
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #49 on: February 29, 2012, 08:51:05 am »
It will be more of a case that if a company fits the product for you and it fails.  There is every chance the claim will be made against them for installing them wrongly and then it may cost them big £££s to put right.  With the APR fuel pump.  If that fails it cannot be because it was installed wrongly, as its a bolt off and bolt on product. If you search topics on other forums even the APR pumps have failed and its just luck of the draw.  Some pumps will go miles and miles without problem.  Others wont be as lucky but its a risk you take when modifying cars.

If you are thinking of spending extra money on the APR fuel pump, I would not bother as its wasted money.  If it was only a couple of hunders pounds then fair do's but its a lot more than that.  Id just check the oil every week and if there is no problem, I always go with the old saying 'If it ain't broke.  Dont fix it!' 
Frozen White Ford Focus 1.6 Ecoboost Titanium.
Mods so far - Superchips Bluefin, High Flow Air Box

Offline RedRobin

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 380
  • -Receive: 442
  • Posts: 16627
  • BIALI Motorsport's Chief Horn Blower
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #50 on: February 29, 2012, 08:57:50 am »

I'm quite torn on this....

On one hand, you have PDT stating that he's never seen a problem with the autotech internals after many many installs  :happy2:

On the other, you have tuners, such as JKM who will no longer install the internals and will only fit the full APR pump  :scared:


....I have no reason to doubt PDT's advice/opinions because I don't know them. But I know JKM very well indeed and am always inclined to take their advice. So, if I was to ever get an HPFP (highly unlikely as I'm happy at Stage2), it would be an APR.


On facebook: https://www.facebook.com/robin.procter.50

Throbbin' Red Mk5 GTI DSG with too many mods to list - Have Fun but Safe Journeys!

Offline ktlstar

  • Always Involved
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 3
  • -Receive: 10
  • Posts: 434
    • Email
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #51 on: February 29, 2012, 09:01:31 am »
Luck of the draw like someone has said on this thread.

I currently on golfmkv site (usa) and i have seen APR pumps fail just as much as the Autotech ones.

I guess you goto catch it quickly once it goes for both pumps. Its all a risk (engine modifying).
« Last Edit: February 29, 2012, 09:16:28 am by ktlstar »
- #1240 ED30 Revo STAGE2+
- Southeast - Vag Com owner

Offline vRS_Pagey

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 66
  • -Receive: 59
  • Posts: 1577
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #52 on: February 29, 2012, 09:11:57 am »
I can confirm im Shark Stage 2+ with no CEL.

So Stage 3 then?  :P

His: MK2 Black Magic Skoda Octavia vRS Estate
Hers: MK5 Graphite Blue Pearl VW Golf GT140 -

http://www.mk5golfgti.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,32783.0.html

Offline 56OctyVRS

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 39
  • -Receive: 72
  • Posts: 1003
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #53 on: February 29, 2012, 09:47:19 am »
I can confirm im Shark Stage 2+ with no CEL.

So Stage 3 then?  :P

Almost.  Sharks Stage 2+ file is a stage 2 file which takes into account an upgraded HPFP being fitted.  Its the max the engine can safely produce with a OE engine cover so in some respects it is a stage 3 with the engine cover fitted. Confused  :confused:
Frozen White Ford Focus 1.6 Ecoboost Titanium.
Mods so far - Superchips Bluefin, High Flow Air Box

Offline Ledreyer

  • Taking part
  • ***
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 0
  • -Receive: 0
  • Posts: 28
    • Email
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #54 on: February 29, 2012, 09:58:41 am »
As far as I know and experienced in the past the cam follower goes slower on the APR pump...

GTI Mk6
Revo stage 2 , full Milltek decat ,  full CAI APR.

Offline muckipup

  • Always Involved
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 13
  • -Receive: 25
  • Posts: 419
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #55 on: February 29, 2012, 10:59:55 am »
....I have no reason to doubt PDT's advice/opinions because I don't know them. But I know JKM very well indeed and am always inclined to take their advice. So, if I was to ever get an HPFP (highly unlikely as I'm happy at Stage2), it would be an APR.

JKM advised me against fitting the Autotech internals but I ignored them. It was a humbling experience limping my car up to their front door and having to leave it there for a few days for the APR pump that they ordered for me to come through  :ashamed:

If you are thinking of spending extra money on the APR fuel pump, I would not bother as its wasted money.   

I guess the viewpoint of wasting money depends where you stand - my £250 Autotech internals and about £80 OEM pump wasn't worth much after that!

In fairness, my Autotech pump lasted fairly well but my map was only requesting stock fuel rail pressure. When I went Revo and got the full 130 bar of rail pressure, the pump lasted only a week or so before blowing the seal in the OEM pump housing. I have been running the APR for 30k miles now without a problem.
Fair do's to those running the Autotech internals and doing OK as I have nothing against it despite my experience - most have been lucky; others like me have not.
« Last Edit: February 29, 2012, 11:07:15 am by muckipup »

Offline sub39h

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 189
  • -Receive: 84
  • Posts: 1719
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #56 on: February 29, 2012, 11:06:07 am »
.
The war of the HPFP's has been waging for years.

If they were both the same price, which would you buy?


....So, all you guys with Autotechs, would you still have bought it if the APR was the same price?

that's a bit of a silly question. the APR probably is better, i think few would deny that. BUT it's not worth 3x the price. it certainly doesn't reduce your risk of failure to 1/3 of that of the Autotech, and even if it does a tuning company on here reporting fitting 100s of the Autotechs without issue, so if for argument's sake they fitted 200, and 1 of those failed, you're going from a 0.5% chance to a 0.167% chance and tbh i'd take a 0.5% chance if it was gonna cost me £400 more for an APR pump

the APR has a reduced RELATIVE risk of failure, but the ABSOLUTE risk is negligible
« Last Edit: February 29, 2012, 12:36:54 pm by sub39h »
2006 Phantom Black A3 2.0T S-Line
DSG | Rear Parking Sensors | MFSW | BOSE | Auto lights/wipers | Half leather
MODS : '09 tail lights | TT vents | Bilstein B14 | RNS-E 2010 | AMI | AKS Tuning custom CAI | Titanium BBS VZs | NQS BBK | WALK | Autotech RARB | Bluemotion aero | Blueflame TBE | Autotech HPFP | MY11 Wing Mirrors | Bluetooth | S3 Intercooler
PLANS: Stage 2+

Offline muckipup

  • Always Involved
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 13
  • -Receive: 25
  • Posts: 419
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #57 on: February 29, 2012, 11:20:27 am »

I currently on golfmkv site (usa) and i have seen APR pumps fail just as much as the Autotech ones.


Isn't that more about the cam follower / cam lobe wear issue though?

Offline Janner_Sy

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 62
  • -Receive: 113
  • Posts: 5392
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #58 on: February 29, 2012, 11:28:25 am »
The APR pump is grossly expensive, but i guess you get the added safety net of knowing it has been pressure tested before hand.

I guess this is why all the guys who have had the failed Autotech internals (but luckily caught it before anything was damaged) are now running the APR pumps

Offline martziniuk

  • Won't Shut up.
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 25
  • -Receive: 18
  • Posts: 584
    • Email
Re: Autotech vs APR HPFP
« Reply #59 on: February 29, 2012, 12:30:17 pm »

I currently on golfmkv site (usa) and i have seen APR pumps fail just as much as the Autotech ones.


Isn't that more about the cam follower / cam lobe wear issue though?
I think so too. I don't recall reading about any leaking pumps, only the ones that shoot through the cam follower.
Mk2 Octavia vRS with K04 conversion, 3"TBE & Decat, APR HPFP, BDM Intake, S3 I/C, Sachs clutch & Unicorn custom map, S3 brakes, AP coilovers, THS mounts.

B8.5 Audi S4 with uprated pulley and unicorn Stage 2