Make a donation

Author Topic: No Golfs involved but........AMG v's BMW  (Read 2940 times)

Offline Janner_Sy

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 62
  • -Receive: 113
  • Posts: 5392
Re: No Golfs involved but........AMG v's BMW
« Reply #30 on: July 19, 2013, 12:52:08 pm »
Oh yeah, it'll never be loved as a classic. Funny how you learn to ignore it though, I don't even notice the dodgy arse on the previous Megane any more, at the time I thought it was awful. I'd still have an R26.R despite that.

Just like these.  Weird, but now a classic that has held its money very well.



Id still buy one though
« Last Edit: July 19, 2013, 12:54:05 pm by Janner_Sy »

Offline tony_danza

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 3
  • -Receive: 112
  • Posts: 3013
  • The voice of objective reason, but mine's best.
Re: No Golfs involved but........AMG v's BMW
« Reply #31 on: July 19, 2013, 12:57:52 pm »
I'm parked next to one the same colour today. So odd, yet somehow 'right'.
Sideways yo!

Offline Poverty

  • Just look at my post count
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 36
  • -Receive: 21
  • Posts: 1543
Re: No Golfs involved but........AMG v's BMW
« Reply #32 on: July 19, 2013, 02:23:37 pm »
Sticky tyres don't fix a duff chassis. They simply move the point at which understeer occurs.

I'll defend the RS3 here. They had an old chassis and they did what they could to make it work. Much like M division deciding it'd be better to underpin the 1M with the M3's running gear.

Technology and engineering moves on. I imagine the next car will be on par with the ones we're discussing now.

Look at the basic physics, the whole engine mass is at least 6" ahead of the axle.



This is true, but it's still worth lap time!

The rs3 isn't the best though I would have to admit